|
Post by Oswin on Feb 21, 2008 15:19:29 GMT -5
Rule in question: Your character should only be in one open roleplaying thread at a time. They cannot be in two places at once. Meaning, if you start a thread describing your climbing of The Sacred Elm, do not start another thread with your character swimming in a lake. The reason I'm considering removing this rule (even though I don't really want to) is because the amount of roleplay activity on this site is very low. I believe it is due to the fact that most of our characters are already in a thread. Options:
1.) Getting rid of the rule would mean you can be in as many threads as you want. (Personally I'm against tihs.) 2.) This option means we keep it as is and nothing changes. 3.) This rule means we alter the rule slightly, so your character can be in more than one thread. (If this, than I think it should be no more than three threads.) To view the results of this poll, you must vote.
|
|
Aidawyn
Apprentice
????????? ???? ?
Posts: 14
|
Post by Aidawyn on Feb 21, 2008 15:27:08 GMT -5
I say keep it cuz I get confused if there are too many threads going on and the timelines can get mixed up. If this is a matter of having more than one people in threads maybe what could happen, like on some sites I played, the admins and staff are the only ones who can make threads and you kinda sort people as they join, y'know place people in threads with other people who you think they'd make an interesting mix with. Just a thought.
|
|
|
Post by Oswin on Feb 21, 2008 15:31:18 GMT -5
Hmmm, I don't think that would really work here. Thanks for the idea though, it's appreciated. I'm just trying to figure out how to fix this problem. >_<
|
|
Rissterus
Guildsman
????#??? ????????????? ?
Posts: 130
|
Post by Rissterus on Feb 22, 2008 13:22:19 GMT -5
I think that if we were to do this we should just change the rule to two threads. Preferable stay in one, but you may join another if you're other is taking a long time.
|
|
|
Post by Oswin on Feb 26, 2008 12:58:21 GMT -5
Hmm, I have another idea. What if we kept the rule, but you could join in threads made by the Hero Nemesis? (Like we did with the Epic Quest that never got finished.) Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by Oswin on Feb 27, 2008 16:16:36 GMT -5
Okay, yes, that's what I'm going to do.
The Rule will remain as it is.
However, threads started by the Hero Nemesis may be joined by characters regardless of the other thread their in. Sound good?
|
|